Our own AI visibility, published
We sell AI visibility. It would be strange to ask you to trust our measurement without showing you what it says about us.
11.1%
of sampled answers named us
▼ 1.7% vs 2026-07-26
Why this page exists
Every agency in this category will tell you they can improve your visibility in AI answers. Almost none of them publish their own. We think a vendor who will not show you their number is not showing you a method, so ours is here, on a frozen prompt set, including the run where it went down.
The prompt set does not change between runs. That constraint is the whole point: changing the questions is the easiest way to make this metric say whatever you want, and it is why most published share-of-voice figures are not comparable to anything.
2026-08-11
By engine
| Engine | Named us |
|---|---|
| ChatGPT | 0/12 |
| Claude | 2/12 |
| Perplexity | 2/12 |
| Google AI Overviews | no readingBlocked our sampling on the day. No reading, and we are not estimating one. |
Named instead of us
| Brand | Share |
|---|---|
| iPullRank | 17% |
| Siege Media | 17% |
| Profound | 11% |
| Semrush | 11% |
| Peec AI | 8% |
| Athena | 8% |
| Scrunch AI | 8% |
| Conductor | 6% |
What changed: Three rounds of content published on our own domain between the runs. Google impressions rose more than fivefold over the same period. Our share of AI answers fell.
run 20260811-103432-wordofgpt.com
2026-07-26
By engine
| Engine | Named us |
|---|---|
| ChatGPT | 1/12 |
| Claude | 2/12 |
| Perplexity | 1/11Partial run; one sample lost to a block. |
| Google AI Overviews | 2/12 |
Named instead of us
| Brand | Share |
|---|---|
| Siege Media | 15% |
| iPullRank | 15% |
| Profound | 9% |
| Goodie | 6% |
| Scrunch AI | 6% |
| Otterly.AI | 4% |
| Peec AI | 4% |
| Athena | 4% |
What changed: First baseline on this prompt set.
run 20260726-235803-wordofgpt.com
What this does and does not show
It shows how often four generative engines named us in answers to twelve buyer-intent questions, on two dates. It is a small sample, and AI answers vary between runs, which is exactly why the same questions are repeated rather than swapped.
It does not show that our approach is working yet. Between these two runs we published three rounds of content, Google impressions rose more than fivefold, and our share of AI answers fell. The straightforward reading is that publishing on your own domain does not buy you a place in someone else's shortlist, which is the argument we make onhow to actually show up in ChatGPTand now have our own evidence for.
The method is documented on our methodology pageand written up in full so you canrun it yourself. Every claim we make about this field is graded in the evidence register.
See where you stand in AI answers
We’ll run your domain through our tracker and send back a free one-page visibility snapshot — no call required.